Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-9010 APU (2016 M.SR) 275 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 33.9 1-Core 35.5 2-Core 63.3 26% 44.2 Pts	4-Core 61.2 8-Core 55.9 8% 58.6 Pts	64-Core 60.2 4% 60.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,424 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.74% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.74% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kimmidi TB900 256GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 241 287 290 203 9.3 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.2% Average	Read 284 Write 199 Mixed 203 SusWrite 219 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 8.2 52% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 19.8 38% 75 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1200, 1200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 4.9 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	31x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	16x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	11x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	24x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GBSamsungBench 53%, 567 samples	7x
M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 936 samples	6x