Today's hottest deals

Unknow Unknow

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemUnknow Unknow  (all builds)
Motherboard NF-MCP61
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 18:04
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Memory 40.7
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 50.7
28% 42.6 Pts
4-Core 50.2
8-Core 44.3
6% 47.2 Pts
64-Core 29.9
2% 29.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6100
Elitegroup(1019 2609) 64MB
Ram: 64MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 9.6 7.2 8.4 7.2 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.03% Terrible
Read 13.4
Write 16
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 11
12% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.03%
Great: 40%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 17
15% 12 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
46% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Unknow Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Unknow Unknow

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback