HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8053
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 12:07
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 408
55% 409 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.8% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 50.5
46% 63 fps
MRender 43.7
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 46.8
39% 47.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 455 468 482 483 483 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 481
Mixed 436
SusWrite 464
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 46.7
156% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 318
240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 112%
Great: 128%
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: DXM03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 398 410 412 413 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 389
Mixed 328
SusWrite 403
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 38
136% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 151
160% 266 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
57GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 70.4
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3500410SV 500GB-$31
350GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 111
Write 111
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 112
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.1% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 25.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 24.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR Builds (Compare 1,783 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback