Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170217
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '22 at 20:54
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 68.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 198 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 637 61% 505 Pts	64-Core 920 57% 920 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 176 Parallax 179 129% 171 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 167 Splatting 116 110% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY XLR8 Pro 480GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 168 128 117 116 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 377 Write 259 Mixed 261 SusWrite 132 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 19.8 63% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 94.6 DQ Mixed 141 108% 151 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 67%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 189GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 344 404 387 352 332 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 451 Write 401 Mixed 355 SusWrite 355 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 32 104% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 286 233% 331 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 133%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 0.2 Write 0.2 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 0.5 0% 0.28 MB/s	4K Write 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 40GB free Firmware: 01.01S01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 54 54 56 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 39 Write 36 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 54.4 29% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.2 73% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x8GB 8,261 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 25.6 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 20.7 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	421x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	218x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $34Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)