Asus Pro WS 565-ACE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive485% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS 565-ACE  (all builds)
Memory122.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 13:56
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$355
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 927
81% 692 Pts
64-Core 2,811
174% 2,811 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZQL23T8HCLS-00A07 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GDC5502Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3324 3222 3127 3313 3269 3172 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
485% Outstanding
Read 2,571
Write 3320
Mixed 2,568
SusWrite 3,238
662% 2,924 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 93.9
341% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,868
DQ Write 1,708
DQ Mixed 1,840
1,366% 1,805 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 485%
Great: 485%
Samsung MZQL23T8HCLS-00A07 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: GDC5502Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3318 3087 2975 2666 3011 3431 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 2519
Write 3,357
Mixed 2,476
SusWrite 3,081
647% 2,858 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 276
4K Mixed 94.7
355% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 2,037
DQ Write 1,880
DQ Mixed 1,888
1,436% 1,935 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 484%
Great: 485%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
9GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 21 21 20 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 20.1
Mixed 9
SusWrite 20.2
26% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A4G43AB1-CWE 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 60.2
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 37.6
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 33.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 114%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback