Today's hottest deals

Microsoft Surface Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 06:31
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7660U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 207
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 307
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 640 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Microsoft(1414 0026) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
9.13% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 8
Parallax 12.6
9% 10.4 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 11.8
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.13%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung KUS030202M-B000 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXY8AM1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 303 300 299 296 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 578
Write 592
Mixed 311
SusWrite 325
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 64.5
229% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 584
438% 592 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 140%
Great: 151%
SDXC Card 128GB
9GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 27 34 27 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 77.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 28.3
39% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9CCNNNBJTALAR-NUD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 22
MC Write 47.4
MC Mixed 20.8
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Surface Pro Builds (Compare 2,443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback