HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2215
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 12:49
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10 PRO-7800B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 62.4
2-Core 116
48% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 175
24% 178 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 2215) 960MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 11.1
3% 6.87 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 5.6
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon I T LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9C08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 283 294 296 298 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 381
Write 296
Mixed 240
SusWrite 289
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 34.4
126% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 150
134% 202 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
233GB free
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 122 121 122 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 124
Write 118
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 121
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.1% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback