Today's hottest deals

Compulab Intense-PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompulab Intense-PC  (all builds)
MotherboardCompuLab Intense-PC
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '17 at 07:11
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217UE
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 67.9
38% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 99.9
8-Core 106
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Intel(8086 2211) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3277
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 3.37
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 2.28
3% 3.36 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST250LT003-9YG14C 250GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 51.6
Mixed 46.4
38% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.08
22% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF 99U5469-045.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 15
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intense-PC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Compulab Intense-PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback