Today's hottest deals

Biostar A78MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar A78MD  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 97.5
43% 71.4 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 158
17% 137 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 2321) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 33.7
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 43.4
28% 37.8 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 301 340 353 304 362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 273
Write 293
Mixed 235
SusWrite 329
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 13.5
63% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 96.7
DQ Mixed 36.4
35% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 101%
MXT-USB Storage Device 32GB
25GB free, PID 8816
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 19
Write 17
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 17.8
24% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 4.6
302% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A78MD Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A78MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback