Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 750
76% 618 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 38.4
30% 38.7 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,299
Write 2,213
Mixed 1,374
436% 1,962 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 85.4
285% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,002
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 1,109
792% 1,011 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
195GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 124 122 123 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 99.4
Write 106
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 123
63% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
488GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 157 158 158 158 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 118
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 156
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
501GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 91 90 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 138
Write 129
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 92
127% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 53%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
320GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 43 32 37 27 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 55.1
Write 37.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 40.9
56% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M1D3000C16 CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 28.9
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $629
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback