Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 21A0S04Q00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21A0S04Q00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21A0S04Q00
Memory8.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211105
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '22 at 20:16
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 900
90% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,070
66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Graphics
Legend(17AA 509B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.01.45
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 20.4
Parallax 29.1
17% 23.4 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 22.8
17% 20.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TDE9X081N 1TB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41720C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 1182 1365 1641 1651 1583 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 2,102
Write 1,726
Mixed 1,360
SusWrite 1,436
371% 1,656 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 66.1
216% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 757
509% 627 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 264%
Great: 385%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE Hynix HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.7% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25.6
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 28.9
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback