Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '22 at 21:57
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 101
2-Core 214
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 366
47% 357 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
EVGA(3842 3656) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 99.3
Parallax 124
110% 120 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 92.6
Splatting 86.9
84% 105 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 53 94 125 130 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 105
Write 150
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 97.5
69% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
24GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.7 9.8 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 24.4
Write 16.2
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 11.3
24% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.4
104% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.3% Good
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback