QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 02:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 165
2-Core 278
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 917
88% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,169
72% 1,169 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 91%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 18.2
14% 17.7 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 16.2
14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 64GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 408
Write 580
Mixed 338
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 24.8
83% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 90.3
82% 125 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 58%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 383 221 231 230 285 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.5% Very good
Read 393
Write 523
Mixed 347
SusWrite 294
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 28
89% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 124
114% 175 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 36.5
96% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 38.1
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback