Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B460M MORTAR (MS-7C82)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C82
MotherboardMSI MAG B460M MORTAR (MS-7C82)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '22 at 14:17
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 708
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 683
42% 683 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Zotac(19DA 2370) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 60.7
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 64.4
50% 67 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 59
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-512 512GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 255 252 255 256 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 453
Mixed 395
SusWrite 240
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 48.4
181% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 321
235% 306 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B460M MORTAR (MS-7C82) Builds (Compare 2,168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B460M MORTAR (MS-7C82)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback