Today's hottest deals

GPD P2 MAX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGPD P2 MAX  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD P2 MAX
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '22 at 20:53
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-8100Y
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 72.6
2-Core 148
59% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 167
28% 196 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Intel(8086 591C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 5.1
4% 5 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SSD 512GB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HYA1S7MB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 695 910 989 1035 1040 693 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,338
Write 1,231
Mixed 105
SusWrite 894
199% 892 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 83.6
263% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 379
385% 631 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 224%
Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P2 MAX Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: GPD P2 MAX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback