Lenovo 20ARS0C100

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20ARS0C100 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20ARS0C100
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '17 at 16:38
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	76%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300U 36,631 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 42.1 2-Core 92.7 40% 64.5 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 173 20% 156 Pts	64-Core 160 10% 160 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 220C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	3% Terrible	Lighting 3.37 Reflection 5.81 Parallax 3.97 3% 4.38 fps	MRender 5.81 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 5.09 4% 4.21 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB 4,594 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT09L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12251 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1201 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 93 93 79 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 4390 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 50 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 199 199 1579 (EA) Unknown 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 49 (EC) Unknown 99 99 34 (ED) Unknown 99 99 79 (EE) Unknown 100 100 0	58.9% Above average	Read 490 Write 230 Mixed 271 72% 330 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 13.6 78% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 74.4 DQ Mixed 13.8 22% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 91%
SAMSUNG MZ7TD256HAFV-000 256GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 195GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 34 Write 37.6 Mixed 35.9 47% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.52 4K Write 9.58 4K Mixed 5.68 551% 7.93 MB/s	DQ Read 9.4 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 5.63 649% 9.15 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 396%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT851S6AMR6A-PB Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.1% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 14.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16