Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 877 671 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 35.6 2-Core 70.9 43% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 72.8 8-Core 72.7 10% 72.8 Pts	64-Core 72.1 4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 183 183 176 184 257 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.7% Average	Read 255 Write 154 Mixed 188 SusWrite 204 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 14.6 59% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 48.5 DQ Write 95.7 DQ Mixed 106 71% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5567, Sandisk Cruzer Blade 16GB Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 6.4 7.6 8.5 7.9 9 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 5.5 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 7.2 12% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 2.4 139% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564568FH8NZPHSCR Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NS-CG 4GB 666, 666 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.7% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.87 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	79x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	11x

RAM
AM1U16BC4P2-B19B 1x4GBAdataBench 28%, 569 samples	8x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	4x
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBUnknownBench 26%, 73 samples	4x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $259

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16