HP p7-1254

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP p7-1254  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20120704
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '22 at 04:44
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 69.3
36% 55.3 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 142
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 1031 MHz, MLim: 470 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 9.4
6% 9.4 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 8.7
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 630 240GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 179 203 196 186 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 209
Write 210
Mixed 196
SusWrite 190
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 17.7
63% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 155
115% 150 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
641GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 111 110 111 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 110
Write 109
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 110
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 68%
Generic- SD/MMC 4GB
3GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.2 6.2 6.2 5.9 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 4.3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 6
6% 5.12 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1254 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1254

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback