Today's hottest deals

HP HPE-460Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP HPE-460Z  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 20 '17 at 10:55
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 52.7
2-Core 105
52% 80.4 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 283
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 03EA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 7.25
7% 8.44 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9.13
7% 8.15 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M4-CT128M4SSD2 127GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 211
Write 161
Mixed 187
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 4.47
55% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 4.54
14% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
750GB free
Firmware: HP35
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 115
Write 107
Mixed 109
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.36
96% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
553GB free
Firmware: CC45
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 104
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.28
4K Mixed 0.36
98% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.4
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-460Z Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-460Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback