Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Memory 27 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 33.6 16% 25.3 Pts	4-Core 52.8 8-Core 56.6 7% 54.7 Pts	64-Core 67.7 4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 506E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.9 0% 0.8 fps	MRender 1.3 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt128g TOSHIBA 128GB 5,624 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0108ADLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 198 234 195 200 201 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 314 Write 187 Mixed 247 SusWrite 196 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 12.3 39% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 77.8 DQ Write 58.4 DQ Mixed 48.5 42% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x4GB 3,234 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 1.5 6% 1.97 GB/s	Latency 273 15% 273 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 3,234 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16