Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 17:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 200
71% 127 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 560
53% 441 Pts
64-Core 557
34% 557 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.20.25.02
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 63
Parallax 18.9
12% 32 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 15.4
Splatting 12.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS500G 500GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8542105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1290 1427 1438 1493 1530 1534 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,407
Write 1550
Mixed 958
SusWrite 1452
302% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 27
161% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 709
DQ Write 709
DQ Mixed 487
427% 635 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 223%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.9
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback