Nutanix AHV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemNutanix AHV  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1040 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 09 '22 at 08:55
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Gold 6242R
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.4% Good
Memory 46
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
66% 127 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 881
78% 661 Pts
64-Core 863
53% 863 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID T4-2B
Nvidia(10DE 130A) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (45 fps cap detected)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 45
Reflection 45
Parallax 45
37% 45 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 45
Splatting 45
37% 45 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nutanix VDISK 183GB
34GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 138 107 105 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 159
Mixed 137
SusWrite 126
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 4.7
860% 5.43 MB/s
Nutanix VDISK 161GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 141 140 108 111 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 159
Mixed 166
SusWrite 126
123% 165 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 4.4
838% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Red Hat 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 22.7
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 6.4
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AHV Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Nutanix AHV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback