Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509UA
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200427
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '22 at 14:47
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Memory 33.2
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 62.2
33% 54.3 Pts
4-Core 95.9
8-Core 114
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1A31) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8.4
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1102 256GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20180000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 81 74 72 71 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80% Excellent
Read 630
Write 73.2
Mixed 132
SusWrite 80.1
49% 229 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 38
120% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 274
201% 272 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 489%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD M471A5143EB0-CPB 8GB
2667, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X509UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback