PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 8.49% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3V DDR3-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150810 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 13 '22 at 20:52 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
67.6%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
8.49%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 206 203 200 210 208 MB/s
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$46
22GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 93 103 99 99 MB/s
|
52.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 4x |
Pentium G4400Intel $45Bench 47%, 36,432 samples | 1x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 7950AMD $290Bench 29%, 33,820 samples | 1x |
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples | 1x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 37% - Below average | Total price: $369 |