Today's hottest deals

Medion Akoya P5320 E MD8875/2431

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Akoya P5320 E MD8875/2431  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-CM2
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '22 at 14:49
Run Duration600 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 159
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 375
50% 376 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Elitegroup(1019 1028) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20.3
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 21.1
Splatting 9.2
14% 18.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 56 61 59 56 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 266
Write 70.5
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 58.7
27% 123 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 13.8
54% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 24.8
DQ Mixed 20.2
16% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 59%
Patriot Blast 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 141 92 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 307
Write 283
Mixed 241
SusWrite 140
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 21.4
77% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 90.2
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 73
82% 134 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 94%
Toshiba HDWM105 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: HDF01A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 104 108 105 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 58.1
Write 70.8
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 105
15% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 1.8
11% 5.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.8
DQ Write 20.8
DQ Mixed 6.7
7% 9.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 16%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 176 173 174 175 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 145
Mixed 72
SusWrite 174
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CC8HD5N-DI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Akoya P5320 E MD8875/2431 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Medion Akoya P5320 E MD8875/2431

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback