Lenovo F0EV0029US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo F0EV0029US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 371B
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '22 at 08:31
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User SUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 217
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 576
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 371B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 7.8
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 12.5
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ128HCHQ-00BL1 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L1QFXM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 228 148 221 245 244 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 903
Write 896
Mixed 850
SusWrite 298
165% 737 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 74.6
250% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 778
DQ Mixed 836
632% 852 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 170%
Great: 170%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 5.7 6.8 4.5 6.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 89.5
Write 0.7
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 6.1
22% 27 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback