Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-780(KBL)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170221
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '22 at 18:04
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 347
51% 372 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$244
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 85.2
Parallax 90.1
85% 93.2 fps
MRender 83.6
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 66
60% 74.4 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.6
Write 301
Mixed 20.6
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 18.6
57% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 44.6
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 133
80% 84.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
27GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 217 209 202 194 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 443
Mixed 423
SusWrite 220
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 56.8
184% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 327
246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: MX15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 72.5
Write 12.7
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 13.2
21% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.9
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback