Toshiba QOSMIO DX730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemToshiba QOSMIO DX730  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA All In One PC
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111017
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 13:49
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 132
58% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 331
36% 285 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Toshiba(1179 FC2A) 1GB
CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.90
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.67 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 3.2
4% 5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3995
Write 3,614
Mixed 3,529
828% 3,713 MB/s
4K Read 376
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 163
873% 239 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 526
408% 559 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WDC WD40 EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3TB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 109 106 108 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 115
Mixed 76
SusWrite 108
143% 109 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 1.1
341% 4.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 1.1
390% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 83%
WDC WD20 EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
314GB free, PID 2775
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 23 22 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.4% Above average
Read 138
Write 120
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 21.6
113% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 1.1
390% 7.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 1.3
428% 4.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Mac SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QOSMIO DX730 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba QOSMIO DX730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback