Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 22 '22 at 17:15
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 139
55% 93.2 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 210
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1287) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 7.4
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.7
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 19 109 75 18 118 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 181
Write 86.3
Mixed 83
SusWrite 71.2
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 9.7
41% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 510GB
475GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 374 351 371 399 412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 475
Write 394
Mixed 393
SusWrite 385
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 16.8
96% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 31.9
66% 129 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 115%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
157GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 89.7
Mixed 58
SusWrite 90.9
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback