Insys HN1-K14C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemInsys HN1-K14C  (all builds)
MotherboardINSYS HN1-K14C
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210907
Uptime92.5 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 21:59
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 65
1-Core 113
2-Core 203
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 277
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 275
17% 275 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1E50 800B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.57 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.1
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GCM2IN2280128C 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 328 344 342 340 337 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 395
Write 319
Mixed 318
SusWrite 330
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 12.2
70% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 43.2
82% 157 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BRBN1G48G16C2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 12.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HN1-K14C Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Insys HN1-K14C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback