HP t620 Quad Core TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP t620 Quad Core TC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 21B4
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140328
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateMar 27 '22 at 23:02
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD GX-415GA SOC HD Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 45.7
27% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 90.7
8-Core 90.2
12% 90.4 Pts
64-Core 89.3
6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330E
HP(103C 21B4) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.33 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 3
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC mSATA 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 138 166 182 180 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 432
Write 189
Mixed 163
SusWrite 170
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 12.8
60% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 71.9
73% 118 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 6.2
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.83 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t620 Quad Core TC Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP t620 Quad Core TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback