Lenovo 81H1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81H1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '22 at 18:22
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 46.4
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 102
39% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 159
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.7% Average
Lighting 60.5
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 79.3
49% 65.1 fps
MRender 57.3
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 43.7
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GDHTNG-8310A 512GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80060C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 228 127 163 207 271 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 220
Write 198
Mixed 231
SusWrite 211
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 20.7
69% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 233
173% 224 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 53%
Great: 159%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81H1 Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81H1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback