Acer Aspire M3203

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M3203  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3203
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 30 '22 at 12:35
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 425
AM2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Memory 52
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 74.7
34% 55 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 110
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320
Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.9
4% 2.93 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 2.3
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH12 127GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTFA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 86 86 74 74 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.2% Average
Read 172
Write 85.2
Mixed 164
SusWrite 81.4
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 24.1
75% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 97.1
DQ Mixed 84.5
75% 115 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 9.8
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3203 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3203

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $73
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback