GHIA Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGHIA Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardGHIA EM_CM218_V2.0
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210525
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 02:45
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8259U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 515
57% 448 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.83 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GM2256G 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 380 396 390 390 382 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 352
Mixed 349
SusWrite 388
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 35.4
135% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 208
167% 232 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 13.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 11
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: GHIA Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback