Lenovo 20154

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20154  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO S206
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '22 at 14:05
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-2000 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Memory 57
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 40.7
28% 39.3 Pts
4-Core 40.2
8-Core 40.2
5% 40.2 Pts
64-Core 40.7
2% 40.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340
Legend(17AA 397B) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.15% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.8
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.15%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LS 480G S300 480GB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 901X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 111 304 281 150 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 377
Write 307
Mixed 293
SusWrite 155
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.6
23% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback