Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 43.4 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 118 42% 73.9 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 224 31% 228 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0301 02F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6708 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.9% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 2.4 3% 3 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.9% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S535N4/256GYN 256GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 119 27 16 28 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 343 Write 274 Mixed 280 SusWrite 63.7 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 13.8 66% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 38.2 84% 168 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 12.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.9 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	48x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	48x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	48x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16