Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '22 at 13:27
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 34.2
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 160
46% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 332
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 31.2
18% 26.5 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 26
Splatting 23.7
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 0.9 11 54 133 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 373
Write 270
Mixed 205
SusWrite 77.6
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 13.5
33% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 78.6
DQ Write 58.9
DQ Mixed 35.9
36% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 55%
SanDisk X300 128GB-$170
14GB free
Firmware: X3540000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 73 107 74 74 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 369
Write 198
Mixed 212
SusWrite 91.5
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 25.4
88% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 193
161% 235 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
424GB free
Firmware: 07.04C07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 64 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 91.1
Write 90.6
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 84.4
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 24.4
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback