Today's hottest deals

Asrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090409
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 07 '22 at 10:35
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 905e
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 74.3
37% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 147
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.57 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dc-600e Mirror Set 0 120GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 6.7 59 50 41 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
Read 181
Write 37.7
Mixed 113
SusWrite 36.9
20% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 27.3
96% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 62.7
DQ Mixed 84.4
67% 94.6 MB/s
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
178GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 81 85 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 84.3
Write 31.1
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 73.8
47% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 52%
KINGSTON SUV500MS120G 120GB
78GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
Read 28.2
Write 27.9
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 28.3
38% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 7.4
531% 7.43 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.7
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ALiveNF6G-GLAN Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock ALiveNF6G-GLAN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback