Today's hottest deals

Chuwi AeroBook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemChuwi AeroBook  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI AeroBook
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '22 at 20:24
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 41%
CPU Throttled 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core m3-6Y30
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 40.3
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 81.7
33% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 98.5
8-Core 122
14% 110 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 515 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 175 249 239 324 363 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 325
Write 287
Mixed 315
SusWrite 258
67% 296 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 13.2
66% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 44.8
91% 182 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 201
20% 201 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AeroBook Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi AeroBook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback