Lenovo 82C4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 82C4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 17 '22 at 09:30
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 214
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 310
42% 310 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aarvex 128GB SSD 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0806A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 142 93 112 132 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,117
Write 606
Mixed 643
SusWrite 140
138% 626 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 27.5
214% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 283
265% 397 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 134%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
778GB free
Firmware: LXM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 131 176 175 175 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 138
Write 144
Mixed 69
SusWrite 156
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 24
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 24
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82C4 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback