Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20205

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20205  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20205
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '22 at 08:06
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium A1018
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 48.5
2-Core 106
40% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 72.3
8-Core 106
11% 89.2 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5011) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC 128GB 128GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 234 230 238 197 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 377
Write 221
Mixed 156
SusWrite 212
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 9.2
43% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 61
65% 108 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 78%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
148GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 34 48 48 27 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 52.4
Write 29.1
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 31.5
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HD0NS-CG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
25.1% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20205 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback