Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 14:17
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 216
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 749
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Apple(106B 0210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 78.8
34% 62.9 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 41.7
Splatting 27.1
21% 25.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 116.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,040
Write 1,052
Mixed 440
187% 844 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 12.9
61% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,116
DQ Write 438
DQ Mixed 531
458% 695 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
69GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 349 349 325 52 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 352
Write 321
Mixed 315
SusWrite 226
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 0.5
31% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 25.8
DQ Mixed 0.5
21% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 23.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 24.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback