Alienware x17 R1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware x17 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware x17 R1
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 16:15
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 71.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 317
97% 184 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 962
95% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,427
88% 1,427 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0A90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 511.69
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 186
Reflection 191
Parallax 179
152% 185 fps
Gravity 146
Splatting 120
116% 133 fps
Poor: 96% Great: 144%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT4P1.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1626 2139 2146 1275 883 937 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,267
Write 1601
Mixed 977
SusWrite 1501
302% 1,336 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 69.1
239% 93.6 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 394
DQ Mixed 727
476% 562 MB/s
Poor: 238%
This bench: 238%
Great: 551%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1690 1687 1693 1696 1603 1275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,091
Write 1,682
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 1,607
384% 1,712 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 89.1
296% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,055
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 958
644% 796 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 306%
Great: 438%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 36.3
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 43.8
SC Mixed 19.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical x17 R1 Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware x17 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback