Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory10.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 17:40
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i5-6300U
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 41
2-Core 85.6
36% 59 Pts
4-Core 82.4
8-Core 65.6
10% 74 Pts
64-Core 86.2
5% 86.2 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2247) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4821
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 43GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,138
Write 790
Mixed 539
609% 822 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 15.3
2,433% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 116
1,088% 121 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 89%
Red Hat VirtIO 21GB
7GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 16 9.1 17 22 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 11.9
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $274WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback