Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-1785

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GT72VR 6RD
MotherboardMSI MS-1785  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 23 '22 at 00:52
Run Duration343 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 179
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 522
52% 426 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 57.2
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 59.5
47% 61.5 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 60.8
50% 61.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 256GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 176 185 154 179 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 451
Write 319
Mixed 117
SusWrite 175
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 34
124% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 132
136% 220 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 96%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
406GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 123 124 122 123 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 125
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 121
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 23
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 21.1
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1785 Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-1785

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback