Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10DRi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X10DRi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DRi
Memory38.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170118
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 12:22
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 71.1
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 156
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 568
49% 420 Pts
64-Core 2,541
157% 2,541 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.10.3
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.8% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 65.3
35% 55.1 fps
MRender 55.8
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 42.2
40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 896 731 687 641 538 558 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,813
Write 1,091
Mixed 709
SusWrite 675
237% 1,072 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 43.3
142% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 322
238% 315 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 172%
Great: 353%
Patriot Blast 960GB
227GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 43 58 45 66 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 441
Write 27.1
Mixed 180
SusWrite 49.2
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 16.8
4K Mixed 25.4
80% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 36.5
DQ Mixed 89.4
88% 148 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 101 106 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 96.8
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 105
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 101 106 108 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 105
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 84%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
957GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 76 83 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 88.9
Write 82.5
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 79.1
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 70 76 83 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 124
Write 125
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 79.1
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x16GB
3 of 16 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 98.8
40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DRi Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO

System: Supermicro X10DRi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback