Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core TK-53 139 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Memory 49.3 1-Core 25.2 2-Core 48.1 28% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 49.3 8-Core 47.7 6% 48.5 Pts	64-Core 48.8 3% 48.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GS 884 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 110C) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 0.16 1% 0.85 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.09 1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S3712 120GB 503 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 105 Write 47.7 Mixed 56.8 15% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 5.78 36% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 19.7 DQ Write 27.2 DQ Mixed 4.41 9% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 3 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.17 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 2.6 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 163 24% 163 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM