Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 29 '22 at 09:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 206
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 523
50% 411 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
MSI(1462 310C) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 20.4
16% 19.5 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 2.5 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R025O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 402 104 40 169 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 379
Write 422
Mixed 337
SusWrite 194
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 37.5
140% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 88.4
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 139
127% 185 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
VendorCo ProductCode 67GB
55GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
9.75% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 3.6
7% 6.03 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.7
176% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.75%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.8% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback