Biostar A960D+V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+V2  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '22 at 14:46
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 117
52% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 184
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4290
Biostar(1565 0017) 64MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY128HDHP-00000 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 112 108 95 92 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.3% Above average
Read 209
Write 198
Mixed 150
SusWrite 113
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 44.9
4K Mixed 29.8
106% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 34
DQ Write 69.5
DQ Mixed 44.1
36% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 108%
Intenso Micro Line 16GB
10GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 6 8.4 7.2 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 6.8
15% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+V2 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback