Today's hottest deals

GPU GWNC31514

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGPU GWNC31514  (all builds)
MotherboardGPU GPU Company
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 11:06
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 141
2-Core 255
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 340
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 13
Parallax 14.6
10% 13.2 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
W800S 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN09124
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 352 341 125 70 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 405
Write 389
Mixed 366
SusWrite 212
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 34.8
129% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 179
146% 203 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 78%
Generic Flash Disk 125GB
53GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 3.6 7.2 7.2 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Read 14
Write 12.8
Mixed 13.6
SusWrite 7.3
16% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 8 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GWNC31514 Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: GPU GWNC31514

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback